• @TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1467 months ago

      Oh no, it’s even worse than that.

      It’s the CEO and other staff repeatedly speaking of the system as if it’s basically fully capable and it’s only for legal reasons why a driver is even required. Even saying that the car could drive from one side of the US to the other without driver interaction (only to not actually do that, of course).

      It’s the company never correcting people when they call it a self driving system.

      It’s the company saying they’re ready for autonomous taxis and saying owner’s cars will make money for them while they aren’t driving it.

      It’s calling their software subscription Full Self Driving

      It’s honestly staggering to me that they’re able to get away with this shit.

      • @meleecrits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        717 months ago

        I love my Model 3, but everything you said is spot on. Autopilot is a great driver assist, but it is nowhere near autonomous driving. I was using it on the highway and was passing a truck on the left. The road veered left and the truck did as well, keeping in its lane the entire time. The car interpreted this as the truck merging over into my lane and slammed the brakes. Fortunately, I was able to figure out what went wrong and quickly accelerated myself so as to not become a hazard to the cars behind me.

        Using Autopilot as anything more than a nice dynamic cruise control setting is putting your life, and other lives, in danger.

        • @LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          The auto cruise on the Priuses at work do this a lot. If the freeway curves to the left or something it will panic and think I’m about to hit the cars in the lane next to me also going through the Curve

        • @NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -37 months ago

          The road veered left and the truck did as well, keeping in its lane the entire time. The car interpreted this as the truck merging over into my lane and slammed the brakes.

          Even dynamic cruise control must never do such dangerous mistakes!

          You should claim that they fix this on warranty, and they should prove that this is never going to happen again.

          • @LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 months ago

            Almost all of them do it, the one most fresh in my mind is the Prius because my work uses them as base cards so I drive them a lot. If the highway curves kind of hard to either the left or the right sometimes it will panic and think you’re about to hit the car in the lane next to you because they’re technically in front of you and so it will try to brake.

            Thankfully there is an option to turn off the automatic braking it will just start screaming instead

    • @raptir@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      197 months ago

      Do we need to go through what autopilot in a plane or boat actually does again?

          • @poopkins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            47 months ago

            Tesla markets this feature as “Full Self-Driving Capability.” Maybe I’m poorly informed, but to me that means that the car is fully capable of driving itself without human interaction.

              • @poopkins@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                47 months ago

                Aha, today I learned that Autopilot is just lane-keeping and adaptive cruise control. I feel that it must be a common misunderstanding to confuse the terms “Autopilot” and “Fully Self-Driving” in the vernacular.

                Many other manufacturers refer to lane-keeping systems as “driver assistance,” and I believe Tesla is intentionally misleading consumers with the impression that their system is more capable and allows the driver to pay less attention.

                • @RushingSquirrel@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  Until you drive it. You know the capabilities, you know when you can and cannot activate it, you know how often it tells you to look at the road and if you don’t prove you’ve got your hands on the wheel, it disables itself for the drive (you need to park to reactivate it). No Tesla driver thinks autopilot is more than a lane and distance keeping assistance.

                  Autopilot is a marketing name, that’s it.

        • @RushingSquirrel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          When you drive a Tesla, it’s pretty clear what autopilot is. The name is a marketing term, you can’t engage it everywhere and anytime, you’ve got to keep your hands on the wheel or it disables itself, won’t stop at stop signs and red lights, won’t do line changes, etc.

    • @Fox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s a common misunderstanding that an autopilot system in an airplane does everything or even a lot of things. The most basic ones keep the wings level and nothing else. Of course Tesla is probably counting on that misconception to sell this feature, but actual pilots using any kind of autopilot are still on the hook to pay attention 100% of the time.

      • The Menemen!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        In an airplane that is fine as pilots are specifically trained on the planes they fly (at least in theory). No one gets a special course in how to drive a specific (non industrial) car…

  • PatFusty
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1017 months ago

    The guy was going through a suburb at 75 mph blowing through stop lights. Ofcourse he has to pay, im surprised hes not getting jail time. This has nothing to do with the car, thats just gross negligence

    • @eltrain123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      427 months ago

      My tesla doesn’t let me use autopilot or FSD if I set it over 5% of the posted speed limit. How is this guy going 75 in the burbs?

      • @BossDj@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        367 months ago

        I wonder if Tesla had this section of road mapped as freeway. Especially since it rolled through a red.

        “Suburb” in LA is a very loose term

        I would think that the guy is just lying, but Tesla would call that out REAL quick.

  • @qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    827 months ago

    Wow the value of a life I guess. I don’t really know what can come close to the value of a life, but this doesn’t seem like it.

    • @burliman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      207 months ago

      What would be the value of life then? I’ll save you the answer: no matter how big the number you say, someone else will say bigger. Until it becomes priceless, which is the answer.

      However death and accidental death isn’t always avoidable. And when we pin the fault on someone we cannot expect to say “priceless” is what they owe the victim’s family. So we assign an amount of money or time that hurts, and call it good.

      Doesn’t mean life is worth that. And saying so doesn’t help anyone.

      • @a4ng3l@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        507 months ago

        Sure but even looking a only the financial produce of one person for a family dwarfs the comical 23k here. And that’s not even looking at the emotional side of things. 23k is straight insulting imho.

          • @AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            257 months ago

            Tesla should be out millions for this. The autopilot feature is a gimmick and not at all transparent. They’re beta testing on the public and people are dying because of it. This is a corporate decision that needs to have corporate consequences over and above legal ones. People shouldn’t just be getting minor fines, they should be going to prison and losing absolutely everything.

        • Tarquinn2049
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -27 months ago

          That’s life insurances job, this would be on top of life insurance, and is more about where the money comes than where it is going.

      • @TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        True. But what if Tesla has to pay a billion for producing software that runs people over? They probably would not have beta software on the road.

    • @ladicius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      187 months ago

      Germany the same. Small fine, three month without license, that’s it for killing a human being.

        • @sbv@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          167 months ago

          “honest accident” is the crux of the question. If the driver was doing everything perfectly and some other party was entirely responsible for the accident, not much (maybe none?).

          But, at least in my corner of Canada, most drivers are not behaving responsibly or adhering to the law. Speeding, following too closely, illegally passing, and using phones while driving are common. If a driver kills someone while doing something overtly dangerous, they deserve jail time.

      • @Pechente@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        47 months ago

        Holy shit, really? Never looked into it but judging by how people drive here (lots of people on their phones while driving, missing red lights all the time) it certainly doesn’t seem like there are severe consequences for any wrongdoings.

  • @Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    407 months ago

    There’s this saying about how if something is punishable by a fine, then it’s only illegal for poor people.

    I don’t even have to finish this do I

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      157 months ago

      There’s a joke that if you want to murder someone in America, make sure you do it in a car. Our courts are specifically tailored to avoid penalizing drivers for “accidentally” killing people.

  • @Alchemy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    397 months ago

    Anyone else tired of beta testing Tesla’s garbage just by being outside on the roads near these vehicles?

    • @RushingSquirrel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -47 months ago

      Human beings controlling cars are extremely dangerous. Drunk drivers, racing, going through red lights and stops, speeding, not paying attention, etc. No need for autopilot for the streets to be dangerous for pedestrians. Autopilot keeps the car in line, which is already way safer than most 100% human-controlled accidents.

      And again, the driver is responsible to keep their eyes on the road, even when using cruise-control or any sort of driving assistance.

  • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    107 months ago

    You honor, I actually didn’t wack anyone with this self actuating axe. I bought it and I told it to go chop wood. The people just happened to be too close to the axe. Yeah I was holding the axe but I wasn’t actually putting any pressure. The tail was wagging the dog in other words.

    Ok so $10,000.00. Fine? Oh alright I guess that’ll teach me not to buy autonomous axes.

  • Roflmasterbigpimp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    87 months ago

    So $11.500 per Person. Huh. I would have guessed it that american Lives would be more expensive.

    • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 months ago

      the car’s occupants, Gilberto Alcazar Lopez and Maria Guadalupe Nieves-Lopez, died at the scene.

      Yeaaaaaah…

    • @14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      oh, it is another crash…

      the driver was really a victim of the tesla/uber experiment. first - someone in tesla or uber decided to turn off the emergency brake assistent because it was giving out what they considered too many false positive alarms. the car at the moment of the accident knew about the pedestrian and tracked him, but the emergency brake which should have engaged was turned off. and then the driver was thrown under the bus by uber.

      it is really hard to pay attention as a driver when there is really nothing to pay attention to. hard to blame the driver.

      • @RushingSquirrel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        When the accident is caused by a blatant lack of paying attention, I believe it would. Not paying attention, causing death of someone? 2 years in jail. You’re responsible of what you do.